A serious request regarding anti-LGBT+ posts on this site.

[Kross Rhodes]

Wasn't used in the personality context I see.

See how this vague type of talk can be miscontrued and abused?

I’m really not sure what you’re talking about.

He made an analogous comparison between male and female private parts and which was better to “be.”

I’m not talking about anything else.

 

[Deezy]

I’m really not sure what you’re talking about.

He made an analogous comparison between male and female private parts and which was better to “be.”

I’m not talking about anything else.

Well while you are talking about one thing....based on the context of me being a dick.....it was obviously something else.

Homonyms....how do they work?

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Well while you are talking about one thing....based on the context of me being a dick.....it was obviously something else.

Homonyms....how do they work?

Dog, you’re being intentionally obtuse.

It’s clear what he meant, but using the genitals for these homonyms and implying it’s better to be the one based on the male genitalia is a bit sexist.

It just is. It was also clearly meant to be a joke gif until you tried to make it something it’s not.

 

[Deezy]

Dog, you’re being intentionally obtuse.

It’s clear what he meant, but using the genitals for these homonyms and implying it’s better to be the one based on the male genitalia is a bit sexist.

It just is. It was also clearly meant to be a joke gif until you tried to make it something it’s not.

I used a gif too



<thiswasajoke>

That better?

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Your gif made no sense. No assuming or gender involved.

 

[Deezy]

Your gif made no sense. No assuming or gender involved.

But you did.....since your gif said "that's sexist"......to which I replied with "assume gender"......which was parodying current gender identity politics of today.

But since I had to explain the whole thing to you.....it is now a declaritive statement since all nuance is gone.

So I guess this means....I'm calling you a phobe

 

[Kross Rhodes]

The root word in sexist is sex. Regardless of the gender identity of specific people preferring people with one set of genitalia over the other is still sexist.

 

[Deezy]

You said I'm being obtuse....but you are being literal.

This is just going to be nothing but an impass.....so I'm passing on this convo now.

 

[Chris]

See smark this is why we don't need black and white rules, just listen to me on which assholes need to be banned and I'll let you know when Deezy is done being an idiot

 

[Chris]

The proof that I'm not biased and only ban people that deserve it is that Swamps is still here, no one can dispute it

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Yes, I was being literal from the very beginning. That was the whole point of the gif.

He made a preference for one set of genitalia over the other for his metaphors. So I joked it was sexist.

That’s it. The whole of it. No assuming genders.

Glad we’re done here.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

See smark this is why we don't need black and white rules, just listen to me on which assholes need to be banned and I'll let you know when Deezy is done being an idiot

I wasn’t gonna ban Deezy

…even when he makes himself a full ass.

 

[Chris]

I wasn’t gonna ban Deezy

…even when he makes himself a full ass.

No that's my point, I wouldn't either. But you don't need to argue with him when he's being a troll about rules bc whats the point lol just ban psychos like SCX and there's no issue

 

[Chris]

You've added like 4 new rule addendums so your phrasing cannot let *checks notes* redboy and SCX claim bias....who gives a fuck about them?

 

[Deezy]

Don't say my name guys......you'll summon the weirdo who brags about ignoring me, but takes every chance he has to talk about me.